On 5/1/13 at 1:37 PM, [email protected] (Tab Atkins Jr.) wrote: > Ah, I'm not proposing that we augment the base Future class with > cancellation properties. I explicitly used the term "subtype" in the > quoted bit above. *Some* of Ron's suggestions were to augment the > base Future class, but not all of them, and several other people > pushed back on that.
I think that covers the issue. Cheers - Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Re: Computer reliability, performance, and security: 408-356-8506 | The guy who *is* wearing a parachute is *not* the www.pwpconsult.com | first to reach the ground. - Terence Kelly _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
