On Jun 3, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Domenic Denicola <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
> Ah, that makes sense! It's a nice way of prohibiting `<script>export function > foo() { }</script>` as well, assuming inline `<script>` corresponds to > `Script`. It would be helpful to update the wiki with this, or more generally > to show how this grammar will integrate with the rest of the grammar. I added a note at the end of the grammar section. Do you think that helps make it a little clearer? Thanks, Dave _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss