On Jun 3, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Domenic Denicola <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> 
wrote:

> Ah, that makes sense! It's a nice way of prohibiting `<script>export function 
> foo() { }</script>` as well, assuming inline `<script>` corresponds to 
> `Script`. It would be helpful to update the wiki with this, or more generally 
> to show how this grammar will integrate with the rest of the grammar.

I added a note at the end of the grammar section. Do you think that helps make 
it a little clearer?

Thanks,
Dave

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to