On Jul 15, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Mark S. Miller <erig...@google.com> wrote: > > No wrapping object type -- those are legacy, to be avoided. See > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:value_objects. The main thing > is value not reference semantics. > > On that page: "It’s forwards-compatible with future mechanisms for > user-defined value objects." How can we be confident of this? I would like to > be.
That's a concern I have as well -- i'm not 100% sold on user-defined value objects, but i think i'd prefer that we get those done before bolting on [u]int64 and hoping that they're forwards compatible. I don't want to deal with any "we can't do x due to uint64" style problems. --Oliver
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
