Well, obviously it doesn’t make much sense to do that for `text()`, but it would be great to have for `exec()`.
On Aug 24, 2013, at 21:39 , Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> wrote: > At the moment, the following two methods abuse regular expressions as > iterators (if the /g flag is set): > > * `RegExp.prototype.test()` > * `RegExp.prototype.exec()` > > Would it make sense to create similar methods that return something iterable, > so that for-of can iterate over the result? -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
