On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:42 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > ... > > Ambiguity is not a matter of preference. We need to validate the ES6 grammar. > Until then, please put back the NoIn productions. They were not there only > because of the silly and unwanted initialiser option for 'for (var x = y of > z)'. They were there because for-in and for(;;) have prefixes in common up to > arbitrary lookahead.
Yup, we went off-track on this at the meeting. But Waldemar's point about arrow functions is still valid. We are going to need to have ArrowFunctionNoIn to disallow things like: for (f = x => x in foo;;) allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
