While I can agree that "monitor" feature (that's proposed instead of `done`) has some benefits, I see it only as an aid for developers that are inexperienced with promises, or as a fallback for those experienced. It looks more as a smart add-on, which to be complete can't be implemented in plain JavaScript, is implementation specific and should be treated as optional.
What's more important it still doesn't provide developer with full control of error handling on JavaScript level and that can be achieved only with `done`. I have problems understanding why such complex and not natural feature is favored over something so simple and straightforward. -- View this message in context: http://mozilla.6506.n7.nabble.com/Promises-final-steps-tp290303p290518.html Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
