2013/9/12 Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> > what Tom was referring to above: "statically separate the cases into two > separate internal methods". > > I presume, in context, he means [[Invoke]] and [[ConditionalInvoke]] but > it could also mean [[Invoke]] and [[InvokeFunction]] >
Yes (I meant [[Invoke]] + [[ConditionalInvoke]]). Jason and Allen's arguments convince me that we're better off refactoring all [[Get]]+[[Call]] occurrences to use some form of conditional [[Invoke]]. Out of all the circulating alternatives, I prefer [[Invoke]] + [[ConditionalInvoke]] as it allows virtual object proxies to avoid consing a function (also, [[ConditionalInvoke]], much more so than [[InvokeFunction]], neatly captures the *intent* of what's going on in the spec) As for the consistency costs, we already have them. This only ups the ante for standardizing on a good library of subclassable Handler abstractions. Cheers, Tom
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
