I'm concerned about the latest version of this on the wiki. The edition parameter requires that we ship 2 tables today. This seems like it might change to 3 in ES7 and n in ES(n+4). I think the only reasonable requirement is that it matches what the engine actually uses. For tools it seems better for them to include this table. I don't want all runtimes to have to pay for something that only tools need.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Mathias Bynens <math...@qiwi.be> wrote: > Forwarding Marijn’s message since he’s not subscribed to es-discuss. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Marijn Haverbeke <mari...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive >> Date: 10 October 2013 11:13:34 CEST >> To: Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascr...@lindenbergsoftware.com> >> Cc: Mathias Bynens <math...@qiwi.be>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, >> Anton Kovalyov <an...@kovalyov.net>, Yusuke SUZUKI <utatane....@gmail.com>, >> ariya.hida...@gmail.com, Jeremy Ashkenas <jashke...@gmail.com>, >> mi...@bazon.net >> >> I have no particular opinion about this. Identifiers with obscure >> characters tend to be so rare that I don't expect to have any trouble >> with this except for constructed conformance tests. Since you'll >> probably be the people who are going to construct such tests, I'll >> leave you to figure out what's sane. > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -- erik _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
