Tristan Zajonc wrote:
What about +:? This actually has some visual appeal if primary motivation is elementwise operations and is a syntax error with that ASI example. The downside is that it can end up pretty close to existing syntax like {a+:1} vs. {a:+1}, although I don't expect that to be a common use.
Yeah, that could work. We're unlikely to use : as a prefix operator due to ?:, and even less likely (as in 0) as an infix operator (note: not type annotation separator in declarations) due to labels.
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
