raul mihaila wrote:
Btw, are private names still in? I couldn't find them in the html
version of the latest draft.
You can tell that private names are *not* in by noticing the strawman:
namespace in the wiki, not the harmony: namespace.
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:private_names
I don't think it's wise to build on them yet. The objections are
recorded in es-discuss and meeting notes:
http://esdiscuss.org/topic/private-names-in-text-javascript
etc.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
