If all you want is a non verbose IIFE, use an arrow function. We should consider do expressions only if they avoid the TCP violations of strict arrow IIFEs.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since "do-as-IIFE" carries with it a subset of the semantics carried by > "do--as-block", I think it makes sense to proceed with the subset first, > and expand if "do-as-IIFE" turns out to be surprising or lacking. > > IIUC, the goal here is to allow a sequence of statements to produce a > value, not (necessarily) to allow arbitrary block semantics. > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
