>
> 7) Hence, it probably makes sense to promote a convention of using a new
> file extension for ES6 source files that are intended to be parsed with the
> modules goal.  .jsm, or mjs, or something similar that is appropriately
> suggestive and isn't already widely used as an extension.
>

Allen, I'm so glad you brought this option up!  I've had it in the back of
my mind for a good long while but I've always been hesitant to suggest it.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to