> > 7) Hence, it probably makes sense to promote a convention of using a new > file extension for ES6 source files that are intended to be parsed with the > modules goal. .jsm, or mjs, or something similar that is appropriately > suggestive and isn't already widely used as an extension. >
Allen, I'm so glad you brought this option up! I've had it in the back of my mind for a good long while but I've always been hesitant to suggest it.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss