On Jan 30, 2014, at 7:43 AM, John Lenz wrote:
> It seems unfortunate that "let" and "const" have different usage rules from
> "var". It seem strange that "var" is considered a statement and not
> declaration as per:
>
> http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-ecmascript-language-statements-and-declarations
>
> Generally, I've always thought of:
>
> "if (x) ..." as equivalent to "if (x) { ... }"
>
> Does this restriction on let/const enable anything?
>
The anomaly is that 'var' was considered a statement in ES1. But note that the
only other declaration in the language ('function') at that time was not a
statement. See http://www.wirfs-brock.com/allen/draft-ES5.1/#sec-14
Declarations have global static impact within their containing scope (function
or block). It generally doesn't make any sense to use them in a conditional
context without an explicitly surrounding block that constrains their scope.
So all new declarative forms in ES6 are treated similarly to function. They
are declarations but not statements. Var must remain a statement for legacy
compatability.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
