Linking to some Twitter discussion related to this: https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/436371508005326850
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:03 AM, David Bruant <bruan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 20/02/2014 06:39, Brendan Eich a écrit : > > Bradley Meck wrote: >> >>> >>> If I am reading the spec right (and I may not be), only the generator >>> should fail? The first call to gen().next(value) must have value be >>> undefined, and the others do not check. >>> >> >> I thought we agreed at the January 28 meeting to get rid of this error, >> but I can't find it in the notes. The January meeting notes have missed >> other conclusions, though. Allen? >> > https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2014-01/jan-28.md# > concensusresolution > "BN: Have to go back and think more about this. Maybe a helper function > can be created." > It looks like no ferm decision has been made yet. > > David >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
