On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Apparently this triggered an @rwaldron which seems to be super-effective
>
> In agenda for April's meeting.
>

Yep: https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2014/04.md

Going to try, but it's so late in the game that I really can't promise
anything--I think it's simple enough that we can get away with it. I will
write up a proposed normative spec (likely based on Andrea's work) before I
present, I've found that's a pretty powerful way to make a case for late
additions ;)


Rick


>
> Thanks
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>  ------------------------------
> From: C. Scott Ananian <csc...@cscott.net>
> Sent: 3/4/2014 6:16
> To: Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>
> Cc: es-discuss@mozilla.org list <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
> Subject: Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(O) ? // plural
>
> Have you filed a bugzilla ticket for this? That seems the best way to
> ensure it will get discussed at the next TC39 meeting and resolved one way
> or the other.
>   --scott
> On Mar 3, 2014 8:44 PM, "Andrea Giammarchi" <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> up ?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
>> andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Brandon I take your answer as +1, thanks.
>>>
>>> I've also "gisted" a possible/basic polyfill here:
>>> https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/9317065
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
>>> andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> actually, since `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor` accepts `Symbols` too
>>>> as second argument, the equivalent with current ES6 would be even more
>>>> prolix than that
>>>>
>>>> ```javascript
>>>>
>>>> var shallowCopy = Object.create(
>>>>   Object.getPrototypeOf(originalObject),
>>>>    Object.getOwnPropertyNames(originalObject).concat(
>>>>   Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(originalObject)
>>>>   ).reduce(function (descriptors, name) {
>>>>     descriptors[name] = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
>>>>       originalObject, name
>>>>     );
>>>>     return descriptors;
>>>>   }, {})
>>>> );
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> assuming Symbols will be definable through descriptors ... all this VS
>>>>
>>>> ```javascript
>>>> var shallowCopy = Object.create(
>>>>   Object.getPrototypeOf(originalObject),
>>>>   Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(originalObject)
>>>> );
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> which I believe is a win.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
>>>> andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if by any chance this could sneak into ES6 ... we have only
>>>>> singular version here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-object.getownpropertydescriptor
>>>>>
>>>>> **rationale**
>>>>> The easiest way to create a shallow copy of a generic object could be:
>>>>>
>>>>> ```javascript
>>>>> var shallowCopy = Object.create(
>>>>>   Object.getPrototypeOf(originalObject),
>>>>>   Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(originalObject)
>>>>> );
>>>>> ```
>>>>>
>>>>> Today what we have to do this instead:
>>>>>
>>>>> ```javascript
>>>>> var shallowCopy = Object.create(
>>>>>   Object.getPrototypeOf(originalObject),
>>>>>   Object.getOwnPropertyNames(originalObject).reduce(
>>>>>   function (descriptors, name) {
>>>>>     descriptors[name] = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
>>>>>       originalObject, name
>>>>>     );
>>>>>     return descriptors;
>>>>>   }, {})
>>>>> );
>>>>> ```
>>>>>
>>>>> I see latter pattern as sort of unnecessary overhead that could be
>>>>> also much faster in core and polyfilled in the meanwhile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to