Actually, that is something that I do understand. esdiscussions *can* be unproductive and emotional. Thus: it’s a tricky balance – getting work done vs. keeping everybody informed and getting feedback. I don’t believe in design by democracy.
David Herman has mentioned on Twitter that he’ll write up the rationales for the decisions in a Gist in the coming week. I’m looking forward to reading that. On Jun 9, 2014, at 17:27 , Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: > On a meta level, I'm continually frustrated by the fact that participants in > the module design refuse to share their ideas on es-discuss until a TC39 > meeting review is posted (which usually coincides with some kind of > "resolution"). Community input is a good thing, right? > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: > > we should have some concrete examples in about a week, in the meantime, here > are the "informal" notes from the breakout session about modules (from two > days ago): > https://gist.github.com/caridy/eefb9b104874465d4e1c > > Thank you for providing this link. I see several names that I do not > recognize as TC39 members from previous meeting notes. May I ask who is > currently working on the module design? > > Thanks, > Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de rauschma.de
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
