On Jun 20, 2014, at 11:36 , Sébastien Cevey <seb.ce...@guardian.co.uk> wrote:
> Reading Marius' email, I realised what I find confusing in the newly > proposed syntax that uses `*' to import the default export. > > The `*' symbol universally represents a glob of "everything", but when > used to import from a module that has multiple exports, you won't get > everything, you will get either the single default export (if there is > one) or nothing. What gives you that impression? Quoting David’s original email: ```js import * as fs from "fs"; // importing the named exports as an object import Dict from "dict"; // importing a default export, same as ever ``` > As a final note, and at the risk of erring in the world of speculation > that Brendan fears, are we just sleepwalking towards pushing people to > work around the whole debate with the "universal": “are we just sleepwalking” – what are you implying? Axel -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de rauschma.de
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
