On Wed 25 Jun 2014 15:19, Andy Wingo <wi...@igalia.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri 20 Jun 2014 15:16, "Mark S. Miller" <erig...@google.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Andy Wingo <wi...@igalia.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > There is one change:
>> >
>> > ({ foo: 3, get foo() { return 4 } })
>> >
>> This is not allowed with current sloppy mode.
>>
>> Yes, good catch. This is a change, and it is now allowed.
>
> What about:
>
> ({ get __proto__() {}, __proto__: foo }) // (1)
>
> Does this end up setting the prototype of the result? Would it if there
> were a setter?
>
> Likewise:
>
> ({ __proto__: foo, get __proto__() {} }) // (2)
>
> This one is kinda similar:
>
> ({ ['__proto__']: 34, __proto__: foo }) // (3)
And another one:
({ get __proto__() {}, __proto__: foo, set __proto__(x) {} })
Does the resulting accessor have a setter and a getter, or just a
setter? I would think just a setter, in the same way that this one
would only have a setter:
({ get qux() {}, qux: foo, set qux(x) {} })
Andy
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
