I meant to add: I think it's *great* that we're still iterating on this. Surely there's a way.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jason Orendorff <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems like new^ is a new argument that is implicitly passed to all > functions. > > What does new^ mean in an arrow function? > > How does new^ interact with a proxy whose target is a constructor? > > -j > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock > <[email protected]> wrote: >> oh oops! they are supposed to be "new^". Will fix... >> >> On Sep 11, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> >>> On 9/11/14, 12:35 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: >>>> https://gist.github.com/allenwb/291035fbf910eab8e9a6 summaries the >>>> main syntactic changes since the meeting and provides rationales them. >>>> These features are common to both alternates. this is a good place to >>>> start, after reading the meeting notes. >>> >>> Allen, thanks for putting this together! >>> >>> I have a question: what do the uses of "this^" in this document mean? Are >>> those meant to be "new^"? >>> >>> -Boris >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
