Let's not invent a new mechanism when the existing WeakMaps already have exactly the right core semantics, and (but for a temporary implementation dead end) already admit of an efficient implementation.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That said, this is really elegant and if nothing else it seems like good >> underpinnings for some slightly-higher-level private state abstraction. > > > Right - the idea is that sugar could be introduced over this for declaring > private fields. Also, this proposal doesn't depend upon WeakMaps for > private fields, per se. We could imagine some new, opaque thing that uses > the same "referenceGet/Set/Delete" mechanism. > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
