>
> My initial worries are largely around the ergonomics---both for authors
> and implementers---if this is our solution for private state. In
> particular, I don't think having to create a new WeakMap for every private
> "member" is very author-friendly.
Even without "private" sugar, I think we could use some Proxy-foo to make
this more pleasant:
const Private = new Proxy({}, get() { return new WeakMap });
const { _x, _y } = Private;
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
