I need to write the strawman:
https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2014-04/apr-9.md#51-objectentries-objectvalues

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Caitlin Potter <[email protected]>
wrote:

> > Have to be really careful adding things to Object.prototype, though —
> even when they’re non-enumerable, they can cause unexpected problems in
> code (code which probably ought to be using Object.create(null), but you
> know, doesn’t).
>
>
> Being a Symbol rather than a String property key probably mitigates most
> of these problems, but I’m not positive about that.
>
> Caitlin Potter
>
> > On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Caitlin Potter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > It seems a bit late to add a default @@iterator to Object.prototype, but
> I guess it could work similar to Map.prototype.entries, if such a thing
> were to be added.
> >
> > Have to be really careful adding things to Object.prototype, though —
> even when they’re non-enumerable, they can cause unexpected problems in
> code (code which probably ought to be using Object.create(null), but you
> know, doesn’t).
> >
> > Caitlin Potter
> >
> >> On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Mark Volkmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It seems the typical way to do this is:
> >>
> >> Object.keys(myObj).forEach(key => {
> >>  let value = myObj[key];
> >>  // Do something with value and/or key.
> >> });
> >>
> >> I don't see a new way to do this in ES6.
> >>
> >> Is it still being considered to add the methods "entries" and "values"
> to Object that return iterators?
> >>
> >> --
> >> R. Mark Volkmann
> >> Object Computing, Inc.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> es-discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to