Right, `map()` et al. plus arrow functions come pretty close to the syntactic 
elegance of comprehensions.

> On 15 Apr 2015, at 20:27, Mark S. Miller <erig...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Dave Herman did an excellent presentation at one of the TC39 meetings that 
> convinced us all to drop comprehension syntax from ES6. I remember it 
> surprised us all including, earlier Dave, which led to his presentation. 
> Anyone have a link?
> 
> The arguments that I remember as most significant are
> a) When you look as how much syntactic convenience comprehensions provide 
> above explicit calls to higher-order operations (assuming we have .map, 
> .filter, as well as the currently absent .flatMap) and arrow functions, the 
> answer is not much.
> b) When your comprehensions involve only those ho operations, fine. But as 
> soon as you try to mix in some other ho operation, such as e.g., a reduce, if 
> you started with a comprehension you're gonna create a mess. OTOH, if you 
> were starting with code explicitly calling ho operations, then there's 
> nothing confusing or unnatural mixing in some others.
> 
> IMO, #a was necessary to convince me. YAGNI. Given #a, #b was sufficient.
> 
> Dave, if I've misrepresented you in any way, please correct. Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de 
> <mailto:a...@rauschma.de>> wrote:
> It’s important to keep in mind that there is no official version of array 
> comprehensions, at the moment. So that is something to keep in mind whenever 
> they are added to the language.
> 
> I’d probably implement flatMap() and use it if I ever needed to do something 
> like this.
> 
>> On 15 Apr 2015, at 18:34, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:jackalm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Jeremy Martin <jmar...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:jmar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Why not just `[...x, ...y]`?
>> 
>> Obviously that's a solution to the trivial example that monolithed
>> provided, but it's not a solution to the more general problem he's
>> alluding to, where you're doing a comprehension and want to insert two
>> or more elements into the result in a single iteration.
>> 
>> ~TJ
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org <mailto:es-discuss@mozilla.org>
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss 
>> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
> a...@rauschma.de <mailto:a...@rauschma.de>
> rauschma.de <http://rauschma.de/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org <mailto:es-discuss@mozilla.org>
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss 
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>     Cheers,
>     --MarkM

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschma.de
rauschma.de



_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to