Developer productivity > hypothetical minor performance gains. +1 to all steps to make the specified behavior more deterministic, including this one.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:07 AM, liorean <lior...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm very much opposed to locking this down for general objects because > it locks the implementation choices for generic objects down. What if > the engine backing implementation was, say, some variation of a trie > for instance? It cannot really be done today without adding extraneous > data into the structure, because lookup in that case happens on a > character by character basis, not on a whole string basis, so > properties that use common prefixes would always end up adjacent and > even if the keys weren't inserted in order by bit patterns into the > trie as most implementations do, they would still be grouped by common > prefix. > -- > David "liorean" Andersson > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss