It would be great if the web app manifest included the dependency graph for the app. Something like the depCache in system js. On Apr 23, 2015 8:03 PM, "Matthew Phillips" <matt...@bitovi.com> wrote:
> I think the issue of round-trips is a red-herring. I spent some effort > trying to optimize an es6 loader with caching in indexeddb and even that > did not help much. I think what caridy said earlier is likely the biggest > issue, processing a large number of Promises. > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:55 PM, John Barton <johnjbar...@google.com> > wrote: > >> Sorry, but what I read was not an explanation but rather a hope that >> HTTP/2 would magically solve this problem. I'm all for HTTP/2 solving >> this. But so far I've not heard or read anything to back up the idea. >> >> Will HTTP/2 make multiple round trips, one for each level of the >> dependency tree, competitive with pre-bundling? If not, then we will have >> to send dependency info to the client or cache info to the server or >> bundle. Or there is some magic as yet unexplained? >> >> jjb >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Domenic Denicola <d...@domenic.me> wrote: >> >>> Indeed, there is no built-in facility for bundling since as explained >>> in this thread that will actually slow down your performance, and there’s >>> no desire to include an antipattern in the language. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] *On Behalf >>> Of *Eric B >>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:25 >>> *To:* Frankie Bagnardi; Matthew Phillips >>> *Cc:* es-discuss >>> *Subject:* Re: Re: Are ES6 modules in browsers going to get loaded >>> level-by-level? >>> >>> >>> >>> So just to clarify, when browsers support es6 modules we will still need >>> some extra library to bundle the modules? This would mean es6 modules are >>> only a syntactical addition and not something functional? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:18 AM Frankie Bagnardi <f.bagna...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Matthew, there are already tools for es6 modules + bundling (e.g. >>> babel + webpack), or converting es6 modules to AMD (e.g. babel >>> <https://babeljs.io/docs/usage/modules/>). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Matthew Phillips <matt...@bitovi.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Can you clarify what you mean about bundling? Unless I've missed >>> something, the ES6 module system does not have a story for bundling at all. >>> Of course formats can be invented in userland but I'm not sure that they >>> are any easier to implement than say AMD's. I might have missed something >>> though, looking forward to your reply. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss@mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss@mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss@mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Bitovi > Development | Design | Training | Open Source > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
