You haven't provided a single use-case example, like how are you going to decorate a function or why.
IMO if implemented it will be incompatible with non ES6 code unable to distinguish between classes and functions unless fully transpiled, making decorators less portable. One thing I like about current state is that you can use decorators even in ES5 browsers [1] Just my 2 cents, Regards [1] as shown in the second example of the universal mixin module https://github.com/WebReflection/universal-mixin#universal-mixin- On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote: > https://github.com/wycats/javascript-decorators/blob/master/README.md > > The decorator proposal does not include decorators for functions, because > it isn’t clear how to make them work in the face of hoisting. > > However, it would be great to have them. I see two possible solutions: > > – A decorator on a function declaration prevents hoisting. > > – Enable decorators for function expressions, arrow functions and > generator function expressions. > > Does either one of those make sense? > > Axel > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > [email protected] > rauschma.de > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
