The existing option is:
let rect = {
get corners() { return this._corners(); },
*_corners() { .. },
};
which doesn't seem so bad. Also, a generator getter would introduce a bit
of divergence between getter and setter syntax.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:28 PM Mohsen Azimi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can we allow generator getter methods?
>
> Here is an example use case:
>
> ```
> let rectangle = {
> start: {x: 1, y: 5},
> width: 2,
> height: 3,
>
> *getCorners() {
> let {x: startX, y: startY} = this.start;
> yield this.start;
> yield {x: startX + this.width, y: startY};
> yield {x: startX + this.width, y: startY + this.height};
> yield {x: startX, y: startY + this.height}
> }
> }
>
> for (let corner of rectangle.getCorners()) {
> console.log(corner);
> }
> ```
>
> I'm proposing to allow `get coreners* () { ...` (a generator getter
> method) so the for..of loop can be written like this:
>
> ```
> for (let corner of rectangle.corners) {
> console.log(corner);
> }
> ```
>
> Which seems cleaner
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
