> [1,2,3](-1) But it implies a function call, which isn't the case. It could possibly be confusing when reading code.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Bob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > The syntactical construct `array()` is unused as far as I know, since > currently it would always generate a syntax error--an array is not a > function. Thus we can use this as in > > ``` > [1,2,3](-1) > ``` > > Shouldn't break anything. > > Bob > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Andrea Giammarchi > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> FWIW `.at` works for me. Anything really, as long as `Symbol.last` won't >> even be proposed :D >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Caitlin Potter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Nitpicking here, but the `nth` method is traditionally named `at`, if it >>> were going to be formally proposed >>> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
