> Le 8 févr. 2016 à 19:58, John Lenz <concavel...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > If we ever hope to include "elvis". > > obj?:[expr] > > would be roughly equivalent to: > > obj != null ? obj : [expr] > > rather than what you are suggesting here: > > obj != null ? obj[expr] : undefined;
We can always use `??` for that purpose, as do some languages. However, using the same syntax as an operator (of other languages) with different semantics may be problematic. —Claude _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
