I'm happy to do whatever is appropriate here. Is there a message I should put in the Readme to emphasize the early stage?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mark S. Miller <erig...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have no problem with that, but do wonder, why? What is the downside of >>>> proposals being on the tc39 hub starting at an earlier stage, if the >>>> authors are so inclined? The upside is fewer broken links. >>>> >>> >> Because having the tc39 "brand" on things sends a signal to the broader >> community about the future state of ecma262? >> > > Makes sense. > > >> >> Also, github forwards URLs when the repo is transferred, so we're good >> there. Case in point: https://github.com/zenparsing/async-iteration >> >>> > Cool! I did not know that. > > > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
