Observables and async iterators are not at-odds. The two proposals
complement each other and address two sides of the same coin (pull and
push).

I'm also not sure what "headway" means here but a few months ago the
observable counterpart to using the `async for` loop - the for.. on loop
proposed by Jafar has been (possibly temporarily) scrapped in favor of
async iteration with async iterators.

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmead...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> By the way, I think observables are getting more headway than async
> generators.
>
> https://github.com/zenparsing/es-observable
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016, 16:01 Benjamin Gruenbaum <ing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would be super surprised if I could use `var` everywhere _except_ async
>> iteration.
>>
>> So I'd say consistency triumphs. Same reason all the ES2015 features
>> exist in non-strict mode.
>>
>> Also, you might want to look at the async/await pep for why Python has
>> added async iteration in 3.5
>>
>> On 14 Mar 2016, at 20:29, John Lenz <concavel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a summary of the motivation for "for-await" and "async
>>>> iteration" in general?
>>>>
>>>
>>> There's a short section at:
>>> https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-iteration#overview-and-motivation
>>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Has there any discussion in not supporting "var" in "for-await"
>>>> initializers?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Symmetry with for-of is definitely an important consideration.  Is there
>>> a particular reason why you think "var" should be disallowed?
>>>
>>>
>> There is not a backward compatibility concern and "var" is a smell for
>> all the reasons that "let" was introduced (per-interation bindings don't
>> happen, it isn't scoped to the block).  (I'm unclear why "for-of" allows
>> "var" for the same reason).     I'm not convinced 100% either way, I was
>> just wondering if it was discussed.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to