I agree that the tone was a bit iffy, but I do support this being in a third party library. I have only a couple times ever had a legitimate need for this, one of which was to write an assertion that I later used. Not sure it's common enough it needs to be in the language. I just don't see the need for it, and I don't feel it would be worth adding to the already huge and complex implementations.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016, 16:22 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Bob Myers <r...@gol.com> wrote: > > This proposal is so far from something that should go into the base > language > > that it makes me choke. > > > > Are you also going to propose that we add `includesNone` and > `includesSome`? > > Do you want to include an option to sort the items for efficiency? > > Why do you provide no `fromIndex` parameter? > > Shall we include an option to lowercase before checking for equality? > > How does this relate to the notion of array difference, which is one way > to > > accomplish what you want? > > > > Just write a library that does what you want and get on with your life. > > This is a grossly inappropriate tone and does not belong on the list. > > ~TJ > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
