> On Jun 14, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmead...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just an educated guess (I'm not actually involved in any part of this effort > - just a random person subscribed to this list), but I think it's because of > ECMA itself. Granted, TC39 has already noted that this one doesn't exactly > fit well with the rest of their framework, because of the constant and > frequent input, and because the software industry moves a lot faster than the > hardware and electrical engineering industries (that's most of what ECMA > deals with).
Note that Ecma has a long history of developing software related standards. In fact the second standard issued by Ecma was for a programming language. http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Standardwithdrawn.htm <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Standardwithdrawn.htm>
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
