> var k = (async function() {await window.setTimeout(1000); return
randomPromiseSubtype})();
Assuming that setTmeout(1000) returns a promise, this code is equivalent to:
async function() {
return setTimeout(1000).then(function () {
return randomPromiseSubtype;
});
};
I definitely would not expect that k in such case resolves with promise of
type of randomPromiseSubtype, same as you never expect that
`setTimeout(1000).then()`may resolve with different promise types.
However if it's:
async function() {
return randomPromiseSubtypeTimeout(1000).then(function () {
return whateverPromise;
});
};
It'll be great if k resolves with promise that shares the constructor with
promise returned by randomPromiseSubtypeTimeout(1000).then(...). That's my
point
--
View this message in context:
http://mozilla.6506.n7.nabble.com/Async-functions-not-friendly-to-promise-extensions-tp364921p364926.html
Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
