Yeah essentially although I'd think of it more as sugar for:
(async () => { await null; ... })()
On Aug 17, 2017 4:17 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Matthew Robb <matthewwr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Honestly have there been any proposals for something like `do async { //
> can
> > await here }` which would produce a promise in the enclosing scope
>
> Do-expressions haven't advanced in general yet, but if/when they do,
> this seems like it might be reasonable. It's just sugar for the
> `Promise.resolve().then(()=>{...})` expression, right?
>
> ~TJ
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
