This is actually exactly what I meant but it looks a lot better. It is also very clean
What might be better is to extend break for named functions.
function someFn(arr) { return if(...) { break someFn return "..."; } return e * 2; }); } This way you know what you're breaking from.. super would imply one level deep.. break already has some similar constructs. In this case it must be a named function or named variable assigned a function. Not a reserved word (break while, break for, etc already works) -- Michael J. Ryan - track...@gmail.com - http://tracker1.info Please excuse grammar errors and typos, as this message was sent from my phone. | ||
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
