+1 for omitting function keyword between export and function name.
Declaring arrow functions without arrow in syntax - nope, nope, nope.
On 24 Oct 2017 7:01 pm, "Andrea Giammarchi" <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> to me this `export foo() {}` makes sense only as shortcut for `export
> function foo() {}` and not as arrow, because arrow missing context and
> arguments will mislead everyone exporting a named function.
>
> -1
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Brian Blakely <anewpage.me...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As arrow function const assignments become the norm and non-arrows the
>> exception, allowing syntactical cruft to fall away makes sense to me. It
>> might be premature based on overall 2015 adoption, but I don't see this
>> trend reversing.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:54 PM, /#!/JoePea <j...@trusktr.io> wrote:
>>
>>> It can be confusing because it is too similar to non-arrow functions.
>>> The arrow syntax is clear in meaning.
>>>
>>> */#!/*JoePea
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Brian Blakely <anewpage.me...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> This syntax is shorter, easier to write, and arguably easier to read.
>>>> What else does it need to offer?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:48 PM, kai zhu <kaizhu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -1
>>>>> this fails styleguide sanity-check.
>>>>>
>>>>> we currently have 3 common styles of declaring functions:
>>>>> 1. foo = function () {...}
>>>>> 2. function foo () {...}
>>>>> 3. foo = () => {...}
>>>>>
>>>>> does this extra 4th style offer anything new to justify making the
>>>>> javascript language even less consistent than it already is? i say
>>>>> no.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/25/17, Brian Blakely <anewpage.me...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > A prevalent pattern has emerged:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > `export const foo = ()=> { };`
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Taking a cue from short method syntax, this comes to mind as a
>>>>> possible
>>>>> > improvement:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > `export const foo() { };`
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Even better if we assume const:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > `export foo() { };`
>>>>> >
>>>>> > That is delicious. Thoughts?
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
