The ability to both name and de-structure an argument. Relying on the spread operator does not archive the same effect considering that the spread operator "by design" has some short-comings related to exotic objects when the objects in question have a rich prototype you want to preserve.
Consider the following proposal: function fn (arg pick {a, b = arg.b = 'value'}) {} This would allow four fundamental things of note missing from current de-structuring status-quo: 1. The ability to have both named arguments and de-structuring. 2. The ability to reference the named argument within the de-structure. This allows the above pattern of setting a default value on the passed argument when it doesn't exist. 3. This in turn also affords you the ability to de-structure while also preserving the exotic nature of an object when it is not a POJO object. That is when "arg" is an exotic use-defined object using the spread operator "{...arg}" will discard its prototype. For example: function a ({a, ...b}) { return b } a([1, 2]) Returns a object with index-able keys instead of the array. 4. Consequently this addition would also afford the avoidance of any overhead that one might want to avoid with the rest spread operation: {a, b, ...arg} in hot paths.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss