That is not raw. On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:02 PM François REMY <[email protected]> wrote:
> What exactly are you proposing to do differently than String.raw? > > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/web/javascript/reference/global_objects/string/raw > > Sent from my phone > ------------------------------ > *From:* es-discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of Andrea > Giammarchi <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2020 12:24:13 PM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* A Function.tag proposal? > > This is something somehow bothering developers and tools, sooner or later, > the need for a no-op template literal tag function that just returns the > string as is. > > The current workaround to have highlights, proper content minification, > etc, is the following one: > > ```js > > import css from 'dummy-tag';import html from 'dummy-tag'; > const style = css` body { color: green; }`; > const node = html` <div>hello world</div>`; > > ``` > > but as irrelevant as the dummy-tag code is, in size, it's a dependency, > and a function that can't get easily optimized, due the nature of the tag > signature. > > ### Proposal > > Provide a static `Function.tag` which internally flattens out any template > literal content. > > ```js > > const css = Function.tag; > const html = Function.tag; > > const style = css` body { color: green; }`; > const node = html` <div>hello world</div>`; > > ``` > > Internally it will place eventual interpolations within template chunks, > and return a string. > > ```js > Function.tag`1${2}3` === '123'; > ``` > > That's it. Thoughts? > > Best Regards > > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
