Brendan Eich wrote:
> Thanks for understanding. Now with that in mind, please re-read Jeff's 
> post and mine. We are talking about working intensively in the next 
> three months on both specs and implementation. Now is the time to step 
> up. Apple was /hors de combat/ for a long time in Ecma TC39. Kicking the 
> legs out from under the table and pointing at the floor is not good 
> citizenship in my book, whatever our (real) failings in keeping 
> proto-specs up to date.

This is getting a little too belligerent.

Maciej has a point which several of us share.  For things that haven't been 
discussed actively, I too have little idea about what their status is or where 
is the correct place to look for the current understanding of their design.  
This became a problem when we went from using proposals to relying on 
individual trac tickets.  I think we should go back to maintaining proposals.

    Waldemar
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss

Reply via email to