Another feature I forgot to include is ticket #370, the type annotation on an object initializer can be a nominal type in some cases. (The trac seems to be down, so I can't quote details. Anyhow I'm not sure if this ticket was ever discussed in a meeting, so it remains speculative.)
--lars > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lars Hansen > Sent: 21. mars 2008 08:19 > To: es4-discuss@mozilla.org > Subject: RE: ES4 draft: Object initializers > > A bug: repeated fields are also disallowed if the object > initializer has a type annotation. > > In summary, only object initializers that look like ES3 > initializers are allowed to have repeated fields (for > backward compatibility). > > --lars > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lars Hansen > > Sent: 20. mars 2008 16:43 > > To: es4-discuss@mozilla.org > > Subject: ES4 draft: Object initializers > > > > I've attempted to sum up everything we have decided about object > > initializers (aka object literals). A short draft spec is included. > > Comments welcome from everyone, especially from ES4 WG members who > > might remember about things I've forgotten, or correct > > misunderstandings. > > > > --lars > > > _______________________________________________ > Es4-discuss mailing list > Es4-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss > _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
