On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 12:42 -0700, Brendan Eich wrote:
> Again, I'm not writing checks I can't yet cash (but we are investing,  
> making bets in code under development). On the other hand, IMHO you  
> are pessimizing for the two-decade-old trailing edge. It's easy to go  
> from "want speed" to "require static types" and bypass the "optimize  
> dynamic types enough not to need more speed" state, but taking this  
> shortcut risks leaving lots of developers and content behind. It's a  
> huge rewrite tax at the limit, unpayable on the web.

I may be wrong but I have the feeling that the works you quote use
type-feedback and that type-feedback only optimizes [single] method
dispatch. ES4 has multi-methods, which are harder to optimize, plus
there are plenty of other checks that may be optimized away which are
related to typing but not to method dispatch, say pattern-matching,
"wrap", etc. In addition, iirc, type-feedback only works after the first
execution of code, so it is not necessarily useful when objects are
re-created at each execution of the body of a loop, etc.

Now, of course, I might be wrong. I'm not really a specialist in OOP
implementation.

> What's more, if the static type system is weak, this course may just  
> amount to requiring programmers to overspecify their code for the  
> sake of VM implementors, without gaining much in the way of safety  
> properties or other programming in the large benefits. Such  
> overspecification can turn code into "hardware" that is hard to  
> evolve quickly, mash up, merge and diverge, reuse at Web scale, etc.

I concur with that. In order to maintain readability, most optimizations
should happen behind-the-scene i.e. by using either type inference (or
something more complicated but of the same kind) or type-feedback.

Cheers,
 David

-- 
David Teller
 Security of Distributed Systems
  http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
 Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act
brings liquidations. 

_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss

Reply via email to