On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:09 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:02 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> I do not believe that ECMA has the "two interoperable >> implementations" >> rule that the IETF and W3C have, but since ECMAScript is a >> standard of >> equal important to the Web, I think we should adopt this rule for any >> future edition of ECMAScript. > > Agreed -- I've been saying this, and I'm trying to line up at four > non-reference ES4 implementation efforts.
At *least* four: SpiderMonkey Rhino ESC+Tamarin MbedThis Opera is a hoped-for fifth. But this is in the future, along with draft specs sufficient to prototype, and tests added to today's ES3- ish suites (which seem to have common ancestry in Mozilla's js/tests). /be _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
