Created a new branch "new-ui".
Dave, if you are still up for helping out with the UI we should
discuss who does which tasks.
/Anne
On 7. okt. 2009, at 11.57, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Why don't you create a new branch. You may have to do some major
changes in html code.
D.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<[email protected]> wrote:
The reason why I asked is because I was wondering if we should
create a new
UI branch so that we can keep the work that Mrinal did based on
Bill's work?
/Anne
On 7. okt. 2009, at 11.29, Richard Hirsch wrote:
I worked on the second version that Mrinal made that was based on
Bill's ideas. "Worked" -- I tried to adapt the messages page so
that
it worked in lift. I was only partly successful. I would ignore my
changes to the messages.html page.
The work on the UI that I have recently performed should still work
with Mrinal's initial version (the one in the screenshots).
D.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<[email protected]> wrote:
I also think it would be best if we continued with the first
prototype
for
now.
Also because it will only need tweaking of the graphic files we
already
have.
I have created a *very* general Jira-task "Finsih web UI"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-100 and included it in
Release
1.0.
There are screenshots of the TechEd prototype as well the mockup
of the
message screen, mainly so that David can see what we would like
to build.
Dick, which branch have you worked in when you have done changes
to the
UI?
Mrinal's UI branch?
/Anne
On 7. okt. 2009, at 10.23, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Mrinal did 2 prototypes - one for the TechEd and one that was
based on
Bill's ideas. I'd like to be able to use Mrinal's first
prototype for
this first release and then move this UI to the prototype with
Bill's
design in the second release.
What we have to remember is that the first UI prototype was
based on
the old ESME where there was little separation between UI and
scala
code - this probably will lead to more wor to convert into the
new
architecture.
D.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dick,
So your suggestion is that we continue with what Mrinal and you
have
worked
on?
With the sidebars (and accordion) from Bill's document?
/Anne
On 7. okt. 2009, at 09.22, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Tried and it didn't work :-<
We do have the html files now which is the most important thing.
D.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]
>
wrote:
Thanks Mrinal - downloading now and will deploy soon.
D.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Mrinal Wadhwa
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Dick,
I have a few wars sitting on my server here
http://experiments.mrinalwadhwa.com/
... not sure what they have
Thanks,
Mrinal
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Richard Hirsch
<[email protected]>wrote:
I looked for a working deplyoment with Mrinal's old war
file but
I'm
having some trouble - it appears to be broken for some reason
(http://esmecloudserver.dickhirsch.staxapps.net/).
I've just finished committing a bunch of UI-related
changes. I've
gotten most of the static strings out of the HTML files and
added
tons
of tabs to beautify our UI.
The message page is still too ugly in my opinion to have a
releaseyet.
I'd be satisfied with adding tabs for the "Your timeline",
"Public
Timeline" and "Your followers" and beautifying the stuff on
the
right
hand side.
D.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:35 AM, David Pollak
<[email protected]> wrote:
Simple == GoodShipping == Feature
Let's make it as simple and clean as possible.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
[email protected]
wrote:
Hi,
I know we have had this discussion a thousand times
before, but
there
seems
to be enough of us on the team to make a push towards
finishing
the
UI.
Dave has some time on his hands, and I will try to free
up some
time
at
work this week and next week. At least enough time to
finish the
graphics.
Before we start a push on the UI, I still think we need
to agree
how
to
proceed with it.
My idea is to do something simple, but functional, and
take it
from
there.
I think if we start building "Bill's UI" we will never
finish.
(nothing
wrong with the design, I am just thinking in terms of the
team
and
how
much
time we have available to build a UI)
I am thinking something in lines of the UI we built for
TechEd
last
year.
Dick, do you still have the version with that UI
somewhere? If
you
do,
could you deploy it to Stax so that Dave can take a look
at it?
/Anne
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
