Ahhhhh, I had Daniel's Java client in mind. Ok, sounds good. I will give my +1 on the other thread once I am able to download and build this weekend.
Thanks, Ethan On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought about removing the client but then where would you put it. > It seems a waste to just delete it. The java client was included in > the initial code drop, so I didn't really think that dropping without > a vote would be correct. > > I had to do something, because the esme-java-client files were part of > the trunk but without the correct license. The release would have > failed if someone looked at these files and saw that they didn't have > apache licenses. > > IMHO: Once we get this release out the door, then we can vote on > deleting it. Maybe, we can place it somewhere else (GoogleCode?) > where it can still be used. > > D. > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, that's fine by me. >> >> I'm a little confused though. Why can't you remove it without a vote? >> And why not just remove it for the purposes of the release? >> >> I've come around on the idea of including it, as long as someone is >> working on it, but it was added without a vote so it seems that it >> should be possible to remove it without a vote ;-) >> >> Ethan >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> It is going to be more complicated than I expected. >>> >>> I just can't remove the esme-java-client from the trunk without a vote. >>> >>> I'm going to add the licensing info to the files in that directory and >>> then update the readme accordingly. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> got to change my vote to a -1. >>>> >>>> The tar includes the "esme-java-client" directory which we probably >>>> don't want to release and doesn't have any Apache licenses. >>>> >>>> I'll cut a new tar and then create a new vote. >>>> >>>> Sorry. >>>> >>>> As they say, practice makes perfect. >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, [email protected] >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> +1 from me, and major kudos to Dick & Anne for the release work and legal >>>>> clearances. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Darren >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11 February 2010 at 21:45 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed >>>>>> within the ESME podling. >>>>>> >>>>>> The candidate can be found at >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/ >>>>>> >>>>>> See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release >>>>>> candidate is a tar archive of the sources in >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1.0-incubating >>>>>> >>>>>> The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-src.tar.gz release >>>>>> package >>>>>> is >>>>>> 4B B4 C8 5C 01 FD 29 F5 73 F3 E5 05 4D 0E DC 1F >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating. >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if >>>>>> a majority of at least three +1 ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming >>>>>> the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's my +1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance for your patience with me as manager of this release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dick Hirsch >>>> >>> >> >
