You also have the problem of the incorrect KEYS with the last one. You know what they say - third time is a charm.
D. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL - I know - I'm getting faster every day on cutting and signing > those releases. > > I'd like to create another new tagged version with the updated > "THIRD-PARTY" file. > > If we are going to create a release, I'd like to make sure that it is > correct. Who know it might be our last incubator release. > > > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Do we need to vote again? >>> >>> I'm ok with releasing the archive that's been voted on in this thread >>> (md5 e1f0236ae2ba5ec1d502778fea724661) >>> >>> I have one unanswered question about the svn tags earlier in this >>> thread, but that's not a blocker IMO. >>> >> >> It was >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1.1-incubating/ >> but >> that was just over-written. Should be pretty easy to get back to exactly the >> previous contents of that tag, by just taking a copy of trunk from the >> revision when Dick called the last vote :-) >> >> Ethan >> >
