I think we could stick to capital `R-`. A few false positives, if any, are probably harmless.
Vitalie On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 02:18, Tyler Smith via ESS-help <ess-help@r-project.org> wrote: > > I have some TeX-related stuff: > > r-mpost > r-pmpost > r-upmost > > I don't know what they do, I assume they were pulled in as part of > texlive. > > Best, > > Tyler > > > Alex Branham via ESS-help writes: > > > On Thu 16 Apr 2020 at 16:20, Kasper Daniel Hansen via ESS-help > > <ess-help@r-project.org> wrote: > > > >> I have just updated ESS using list-packages. R-4.0 is not found > >> due to the > >> value of ess-r-runners-prefixes. This can of course be > >> customized, but I > >> think it should be changed to include "R-4" > > > > Thanks. I wonder if we should just look for any R-* values. Can > > anyone > > think of instances of an executable named R-* on exec-path that > > *isn't* > > a version of R? > > > > Alex > > > > ______________________________________________ > > ESS-help@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help > > > -- > Tyler Smith > plantarum.ca > > ______________________________________________ > ESS-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help ______________________________________________ ESS-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help