|
i like #2, then #1. slight variations of those would be #2 slightly darker, very slightly. both with the superscribed Apache like #4. perhaps #1 and #2 with thinner lines, but i'm guessing you're using a font which might not allow that. scott out Thien wrote: |
- Re: etch logos, again... scott comer (sccomer)
- Re: etch logos, again... James Dixson
- Re: etch logos, again... Thien
- Re: etch logos, again... Thien
- Re: etch logos, again... scott comer
- Re: etch logos, again... Thien
- Re: etch logos, again... scott comer
- Re: etch logos, again... James Dixson
- Re: etch logos, again.... Thien
- Re: etch logos, again.... scott comer (sccomer)
- Re: etch logos, again.... James Dixson
- Re: etch logos, again.... Niclas Hedhman
- Re: etch logos, again.... Thien
- Re: etch logos, again... Niclas Hedhman

