Thanks Niclas, we recognize the importance of the package name change. I have been thinking privately that the package name change would be 1.1.
Scott was that your thought as well? On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > ASF will not approve a continuation of anything but package names of > "org.apache.etch...", and such change is in reality an incompatible > change, which should be planned ahead. Meaning, feel free to keep it > in a 1.0.2 release (another note, a dotdot release only communicates > bug fixes, without additional features), but the change needs to > happen prior to graduation, so I recommend "sooner" rather than > "later", and have a transparent discussion within the community if > that would become a 1.1 or a 2.0 release. > > > Cheers > Niclas > -- > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java >
