[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ETCH-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12671382#action_12671382
]
James Dixson commented on ETCH-60:
----------------------------------
I think this issue and ETCH-30 beg the need for some kind of option/extension
syntax for the compiler options.
maybe something like:
etch ... -X interfaces -X no-implementation-class
etch ... -X default-constructor
> Would be useful for an extra what option that splits apart generating
> interfaces and their supporting classes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ETCH-60
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ETCH-60
> Project: Etch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: compiler
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2
> Reporter: Richard Bolkey
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> A what option on the compiler that could tell languages that support
> interfaces to only generate the interface files or only the implementation
> files would be helpful for separating those files into different packages or
> creating mocks from the interfaces.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.