[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ETCH-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12671382#action_12671382
 ] 

James Dixson commented on ETCH-60:
----------------------------------

I think this issue and ETCH-30 beg the need for some kind of option/extension 
syntax for the compiler options.

maybe something like:

   etch ... -X interfaces -X no-implementation-class
   etch ... -X default-constructor




> Would be useful for an extra what option that splits apart generating 
> interfaces and their supporting classes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ETCH-60
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ETCH-60
>             Project: Etch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: compiler
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2
>            Reporter: Richard Bolkey
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> A what option on the compiler that could tell languages that support 
> interfaces to only generate the interface files or only the implementation 
> files would be helpful for separating those files into different packages or 
> creating mocks from the interfaces.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to